A new poll shows that more people in the United States would like to see marijuana legalized and taxed than would like to keep it illegal and continue to waste money on the failed "war on drugs". It seems that a plurality of Americans realize that we have already wasted over a trillion dollars on the drug war and accomplished nothing except to fill our prisons with non-violent drug users, when we could be taxing the gentle drug (it is not nearly as dangerous as other legal drugs) and helping all levels of government solve their fiscal problems.
Why won't the government even consider legalizing marijuana? Why can't we even have a real debate over it? Could it be because the "war on drugs" is nearly as lucrative as the illegal drug trade (just for a different set of people)? The truth is that too many people and organizations make too much money off the drug war -- even though they have failed to stop, or even slow down, the flow of illegal drugs into this country. It is a repeat of the failure of prohibition, when government couldn't stop illegal alcohol from entering the country -- and thus created a lucrative and dangerous underground trade that made the criminals rich.
Marijuana is not physically addictive, and no one can overdose and die from using it. It is as safe as a drug can be. There is no reason why we shouldn't take the growth and sales out of the hands of criminals by legalizing it. It would not only create many new jobs in the growth, distribution, and sales of marijuana, but it would also support new taxes at all levels of government. Governments could be making money instead of spending it.
The poll I talked about in the first paragraph is the Rasmussen Poll. Here are the numbers from that poll:
Legalize & tax marijuana...............47%
Keep marijuana illegal...............42%
Clueless (don't know)...............10%
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/9-9RAQW9PTE/more-people-want-to-l
egalize-marijuana.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Amazing video as Google demonstrates its new 'self-driving' car technology with a legally blind man as the 'driver.' Watch. [...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/1r02PRHZ7XM/adventures_in_s
elf-driving_cars.php
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Political Cartoon is by Drew Sheneman at Tribune Media Services.
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/5faTt87Z8lo/outrage-is-only-for-g
op-males.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Canned Heat -- Move On Down The Road, Bremen, Germany, January 31, 1970.[...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/firedoglake/fdl/~3/bch_j5U0xSo/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Feel free to jump on up to LLN with Suzanne or CT or newton ... or whoever's up tonight (I never have figured out the rotation tho they've explained it time and again.....crap,,,, could that be incipient dementia???)
Read The Full Article:
http://firedoglake.com/2012/03/29/late-night-fdl-dementia-in-tweets/#comment-2511
656
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Columbia University geophysicist Klaus Jacob ("an expert on urban environmental disasters" is how he was described last year by the Village Voice's Elizabeth Dwoskin, who had profiled him in 2008) is seen here talking about the impact of climate change on the area around Brooklyn's legendarily polluted Gowanus Canal. Jacob was one of the distinguished participants in last night's "Planet Under Pressure: Climate Change and Mass Transit" panel at the New York Transit Museum.
by Ken
It probably was a tiny reflection of the Planet Under Pressure, er, festivities (not the right word, I'm sure) in London, which began Monday and wound up today, but last night the New York Transit Museum pitched in with a gathering of three outstandingly and diversely qualified experts for a "Planet Under Pressure: Climate Change and Mass Transit" panel moderated by journalist Andrea Bernstein, a specialist in transportation issues (she's director of the public radio Transportation Nation project).
For me it was a good news-bad news kind of deal. As I just wrote in a note to Howie: "The problem isn't that the people working on the subject are incompetent or misdirected. On the contrary, the three people on last night's panel seemed fantastically competent, and are actually working on real-world projects. The problem is the resources available to deal with the problem are a tiny fraction of what's needed, and the prospect of significantly augmenting them is roughly zero -- and getting lower every day in the America of Defiantly Resolute Denial of Reality."
But to return to the good news for a moment. The panel members are doing good and important work from their respective vantage points: Klaus Jacob as a research scientist who has spent a lot of years looking closely at the impact of environmental change, including what can be and is being done to adapt to it; Projjal Dutta, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's director of sustainability initiatives, whose job includes applying such financial resources as are available to the task of making the system as prepared as possible for the new climate realities; and David Bragdon, director of the Mayor's Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability, which makes him overseer of PlaNYC 2030, created by the Bloomberg administration in 2007 to coordinate the efforts of 25 city agencies "to prepare the city for one million more residents, strengthen our economy, combat climate change, and enhance the quality of life for all New Yorkers."
Four years ago we asked what we want our city to look and feel like in 2030.
A growing population, aging infrastructure, a changing climate, and an evolving economy posed challenges to our city?s success and quality of life. But we recognized that we will determine our own future by how we respond to and shape these changes with our own actions.
We created PlaNYC as a bold agenda to meet these challenges and build a greener, greater New York.
Today, we put forward an updated plan that builds upon the progress and lessons of the past four years.
-- from the PlaNYC 2030 website
Dutta (right) explained that the city's relative readiness for Hurricane Irene had a lot to do with lessons learned from what went wrong in the preparation for and response to a severe August 2007 storm, including the importance of quick response and a sensitivity to the parts of the system that are potentially most vulnerable to flooding.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!And finally...
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!yep, I've noticed that too. But I still feel the need to fill in when the regular scolds aren't around. Off to bed.
Read The Full Article:
http://firedoglake.com/2012/03/29/late-night-fdl-dementia-in-tweets/#comment-2511
655
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Every Thursday at 11:00pm eastern, unless I get the boot, which isn't outside the realm of possibility. I'll also be filling in for Teddy, same time, April 15 and 22.
Read The Full Article:
http://firedoglake.com/2012/03/29/late-night-fdl-dementia-in-tweets/#comment-2511
652
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!I was driving around Houston a few days ago, and came upon this water and palm tree. With this being a construction site and with a highway in the background, this seemed just how an oasis would be in Houston. This would be an oasis with water you could not drink, and with a tree [...]![]()
Read The Full Article:
http://texasliberal.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/a-houston-oasis/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Powered by blogdig.net