Political Cartoon is by Pat Bagley in the Salt Lake Tribune.
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/IuxyvTK-K4M/gop-health-care-attit
ude.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
(The image above is from the website of Vanity Fair.)
The ridiculous decision made by the Supreme Court in Citizens United vs. FEC has had a profound effect on the American electoral process already. It allows candidates to get around the campaign donation limits (and even allows those donors to remain secret). It has also given the candidates some deniability regarding negative advertising.
This is especially true of Willard Mitt Romney (aka Wall Street Willie). His super-PAC has been very successful at raising money (most of it from Wall Street and big corporations). And that super-PAC, Restore Our Future, has acted as the campaign's "attack dog". It is responsible for nearly all of the negative attack ads done on behalf of Romney.
The Romney campaign has spent about $11.8 million on broadcast ads (12,817 spots), and almost all of them have been positive spots promoting Romney. But that does not mean Romney has waged a positive campaign. His super-PAC has spent about $36.1 million, and $35 million (96.95%) of that has been spent on negative advertising attacking his GOP opponents (Santorum and Gingrich).
Of course the Romney campaign (and some right-wing apologists) will claim that Romney has no control over what his super-PAC does, since it is against federal law for the two entities to be combined. If any of you really believe that, please give me a call. I've got some ocean-front property here in Amarillo that I'll sell real cheap. It takes nothing more than a wink and a nod for the campaign to control super-PAC actions.
And you can bet this will continue if Romney is the nominee in the general election. He will try to act innocent, while his super-PAC viciously attacks the president.
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/ch85odtbgVI/romneys-super-pac-att
ack-dog.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Political Cartoon is by Mike Luckovich in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/fMs6HlVXJ1U/recovering.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
There is a fairly significant portion of the American electorate that claims America is a christian nation. They tell us that this country was founded as a christian nation and remains so today, and because of this they want to force all Americans to abide by their beliefs by passing laws requiring that.
The first part, that America was founded as a christian nation, is easily disproved. Not only does the Constitution guarantee freedom of religion (which encompasses all beliefs, and not just christianity), but a treaty ratified by the U.S. Senate in the early 1800s (only a few years after the nation was founded) verifies that the United States is a secular nation.
That leaves the second assertion -- that the United States is today a religious nation (i.e., a christian nation). Is that really true? Not so much. A recent Gallup Poll shows that less than half of all Americans consider themselves to be "very religious". This poll asked Americans to choose one of three categories:
VERY RELIGIOUS -- These people claim religion is important and attend religious services regularly (at least once a week).
NONRELIGIOUS -- These people say religion is not important and almost never attend religious services.
MODERATELY RELIGIOUS -- These people either claim religion is important but don't attend services, or claim it is not important but attend services anyway.
So how does this break down? It turns out that only four out of ten Americans consider themselves to be very religious. Here are the numbers:
VERY RELIGIOUS...............40%
NONRELIGIOUS...............32%
MODERATELY RELIGIOUS...............28%
So it turns out that those who would like to legislate religion into our American law are in the minority. And since many of that 40% who are in the "very religious" category are among those who believe the First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion (the freedom to believe in any religion, or none at all), that means those who wish to legislate their own religious morality are in an even smaller minority. It is time for decent Americans of all faiths (and no faith) to stand up to this tiny minority of religious bigots.
An interesting part of the Gallup Poll was a ranking of states according to their religiosity. This was done by ranking them according to the number of people in each state who claimed to be very religious. Here are the top ten states in both the "most religious" and least religious" categories:
LEAST RELIGIOUS
1. Vermont...............23%
1. NewHampshire...............23%
3. Maine...............25%
4. Massachusetts...............28%
4. Alaska...............28%
6. Oregon...............30%
6. Nevada...............30%
6. Washington...............30%
9. Connecticut...............31%
10. New York...............32%
10. Rhode Island...............32%
MOST RELIGIOUS
1. Mississippi...............59%
2. Utah...............57%
3. Alabama...............56%
4. Arkansas...............54%
4. Louisiana...............54%
4. South Carolina...............54%
7. Tennessee...............52%
8. North Carolina...............50%
9. Georgia...............48%
9. Oklahoma...............48%
If your state is not listed, you can go to the Gallup site (linked above) to see how it ranks (by just moving your computer icon to hover over the state in question).
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/tK36P6O2zGE/is-us-religious-natio
n.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Political Cartoon is by Chan Lowe in the Florida Sun-Sentinel.
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/lhav/~3/OhcyJgPHEq4/irony.html
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Randy Newman -- You've Got A Friend In Me, Jazz Open, Stuttgart, July 26, 2006.[...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/firedoglake/fdl/~3/qvQESLDo-vo/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!And finally...
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
During the current long drawn out Republican primary season-- obviously planned down to the tea by David Plouffe-- a normal reaction would be to wonder, what serious person votes for any of these freaks? And that's not a frivolous question-- although going through all the pages and pages of shortcomings of these candidates would be. No doubt Plouffe selected all of them as well. Santorum just won-- pretty substantially-- three of the most backward (and backward by every conceivable measure) states in the Union, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana and there can be little doubt why he's winning states like that. Yes, it's the backwardness being drawn to his backward message. Makes sense. And Romney... he's basically winning all the non-Confederate states. In fact, Republicans are saying that if Romney beats him in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, it's all over and Romney's the winner. But why does he have a base? Or does he? Sure he does, rich people.
I remember when it was the people who make over $250,000 a year that saved him from red neck humiliation in Ohio. And even in Louisiana, where he was trounced-- you watched that Pelosi video linked above? Louisiana is next door to Mississippi... and they vie for the prize-- rich people were true to their school, even though Santorum won 63 of Louisiana's 64 parishes and kicked his butt by a startling 22 points. Romney, the putative GOP nominee lost every single demographic group except one-- people making over $200,000 a year. Steve Benen put this simple but extremely telling graph together:
Every single Republican with a car elevator in his or her home is voting for Willard. So, yes... Romney is the candidate of the one percent; period.
How about Democratic Party conservatives? Who's their base? Another good question, and one that was demonstrated at a live chat a few weeks ago at Blue NC featuring conservative Terry Bellamy. Bellamy, a very reactionary and small-minded Blue Dog-type who masks her disgusting bigotry in "religious convictions," tried-- unsuccessfully-- to play down her anti-LGBT prejudices. She also managed to make it clear that she stands with the Republicans on women's Choice.
She's against Choice and it sounds like she's be the perfect little stooge in the Republican War Against Women. Do Democrats really want to nominate a candidate who basically parrots Patrick McHenry? Will Democratic women feel enthusiastic about going out to vote for someone who says "I personally am opposed to abortion except in cases of rape, incest or where the life of the mother is at risk?" The DCCC seems to think so. They attack Republicans for saying the exact same thing and then push this shill against progressive state Rep. Patsy Keever. Very strange.
As for the politically active LGBT community (and their friends and relatives)... somehow I feel that between Bellamy's horribly anti-gay voting record on the City Council and statements like "My faith informs me that marriage is between one man and one woman," she's not going to be able to inspire much support. But, like Santorum and Romney, she does have a base-- small-minded bigots.
And here's where Terry Bellamy (D) and Rick Santorum (R) come together and meld into one hideous beast:
Evangelicals have cast a majority of the vote in the Republican presidential primaries so far in the 2012 cycle, the highest percentage recorded in a presidential nominating process in the modern era, according to an analysis of entrance and exit polls conducted by the Faith and Freedom Coalition.
Through March 12, an estimated total of 4.29 million evangelical Christian voters have gone to the polls in the 16 primaries and caucuses for which exit or entrance polls were conducted by news organizations, out of a total of 8.49 million total votes cast. This 50.53% evangelical turnout rate compares to a 44% turnout rate in the 2008.?Conservative people of faith are playing a larger role in shaping the contours and affecting the trajectory of the Republican presidential nomination contest than at any time since they began pouring out of the pews and into the precincts in the late 1970?s,? said Ralph Reed, founder and chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition. ?They are indispensable to any winning strategy for the eventual Republican presidential nominee in both the primaries and the general election. Any candidate who ignores these voters and the values that motivate them does so at their own peril.?
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!What is California Democratic campaign treasurer Kinde Durkee alleged to have purchased with some of the more than $7 million stolen from her clients? Ice cream. [...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/Hw5VMysE3j8/32_flavors_of_e
mbezzlement.php
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Powered by blogdig.net