Retail Stories

post from Eschaton on 26 December 2007 10:13:00 AM. © Eschaton

I try not to get sucked into following holiday retail sales. It seems (could be wrong) that every year we get initial reports of cautious optimism by retailers followed by stories of doom and gloom capped off with the final it was pretty good after all narrative.

For those concerned about the fortunes of retailers, the sales data don't mean much anyway as they don't tell us anything about just how low prices were cut to get those sales.

Still if this data is to be believed, sales fell in real terms this year. Perhaps we're winning the war on Christmas after all!

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/206565743/2007_12_23_archive.html

Digg this

Ten spinners spinning, nine internal wars raging

post from The American Street on 26 December 2007 10:09:00 AM. © The American Street

As a followup to the bit on Iraq I posted earlier today, Juan Cole begins Top Ten season in fine[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://www.reachm.com/amstreet/archives/2007/12/26/ten-spinners-spinning-nine-int
ernal-wars-raging/

Digg this

Is 2008 the Year Democrats Finally Realize Iraq
Is An Occupation

post from Out Of Iraq Bloggers Caucus on 26 December 2007 10:04:00 AM. © Out Of Iraq Bloggers Caucus

The topic below was originally posted on my blog, the Intrepid Liberal Journal, as well as the Independent Bloggers Alliance, the Peace Tree, the Out of Iraq Bloggers Caucus, the Wild Wild Left and Worldwide Sawdust.

In 2007, the Democratic Party was a self-gelding machine of ineptitude. Activists such as myself worked feverishly in 2006 to retake congress and end America?s occupation of Iraq. Instead the Bush Administration implemented a ?surge? as Democrats retreated from flexing their constitutional muscle. They continued to fund military operations, never invoked the War Powers Act and impeachment was taken off the table.

Remarkable considering how unpopular both the Iraq occupation and President Bush had become. Cracks even appeared in the façade of GOP unity as their Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell warned the Bush Administration that congressional Republicans would not allow Iraq to harm their electoral prospects in 2008. Indeed, on June 26th the Washington Post quoted McConnell as saying,

?I anticipate that we'll probably be going in a different direction in some way in Iraq. And it'll be interesting to see what the administration chooses to do."

McConell was anticipating the September testimony of Army General David H. Petraues. Yet as 2007 ends there is no denying that the unpopular Bush Administration successfully thwarted both the Democratic majority and the will of the people. How did this happen?

One can offer all sorts of explanations. Among them is that sixty-votes are required in the Senate and a thin Democratic majority had no real shot of making a difference. Others may prefer to scapegoat Moveon.org for their controversial ?Betray Us? advertisement prior to the testimony of the highly decorated General Petraeus. Finally, some may simply contend that the surge worked and the rationale for withdrawal no longer applies.

Personally, I believe Democrats never truly wanted to end our occupation in Iraq. Iraq had sapped Bush?s popularity into oblivion, debased the Republican brand and helped fill Democratic coffers. Hence, both Reid and Pelosi were content to pursue the politics of symbolism without truly forcing the Administration?s hand.

Casting symbolic votes about timetables appeared safe and had the added advantage of keeping congressional Republicans on the defensive for supporting an unpopular war. It seemed a sure way to enhance their congressional majority as well as retake the White House but changed nothing on the ground. As a result, 2007 ends with congressional Democrats appearing impotent and unprincipled. Is it any wonder their poll ratings are so low?

Tragically, Democrats failed to realize that the American public opposed the war because we were perceived as losing rather than believing toppling Saddam?s government was wrong. Furthermore, even Americans who opposed the war from the beginning are instinctively repulsed at the notion of ?losing? a war. Culturally, Americans don?t accept losing a war gracefully. Most countries don?t. For example, the Vietnam War was unpopular at the end yet liberals were easily stigmatized as weak defeatists for opposing it. Hence, once the so-called surge helped establish superficial conditions of stability, casting symbolic votes about withdrawal deadlines ceased to be effective.

It is therefore imperative that in 2008 Democrats stop referring to Iraq as a war but an occupation instead. The war in Iraq was both ill conceived and immoral. Many citizens including myself took to the streets and protested in 2002-2003. We didn?t protest because we feared losing. Rather we didn?t accept the rationale for the war and feared the occupation to follow.

The war as we all know ended when President Bush declared ?Mission Accomplished.? Saddam?s regime was easily toppled and weapons of mass destruction were never found. The military did its job. The war was wrong but it happened and we won. We have been sustaining a brutal occupation since its conclusion. Occupations typically result in the wholesale deaths and torture of civilians. Maintaining an occupation is corrupting to the ?victor.? Numerous people including bloggers and thinkers far more intelligent and eloquent than myself already reached that conclusion and the folly of buying into Bush?s framing the Iraq debate as a ?war.?

As George Lakoff wrote on July 5, 2006,

?In an occupation, there are pragmatic issues: Are we welcome? Are we doing the Iraqis more harm than good? How badly are we being hurt? The question is not whether to withdraw, but when and how? What to say? You might prefer ?End the occupation now? or ?End the occupation by the end of the year? or ?End the occupation within a year,? but certainly Congress and most Americans should be able to agree on ?End the occupation soon.? In an occupation, not a war, should the president still have war powers? How, if at all, is the Supreme Court decision on military tribunals at Guantanamo affected if we are in an occupation, not a war? What high-handed actions by the President, if any, are ruled out if we are no longer at war??

If Democrats at long last get their heads out of their ass the ?surge? can be looked upon in its appropriate context. Yes, the surge reduced deaths of American GIs. Tactically it?s been a success. To deny that is to ignore reality. Even more significant are the Iraqi Sunnis resisting al Quaeda themselves. But what does any of that have to do with ending America?s immoral occupation, facilitating a political settlement inside Iraq and earning a measure of diplomatic good will in the Muslim world? As long as this occupation has a white Christian face we?ve condemned ourselves to walking on a toxic treadmill. The occupation is not beneficial to America or Iraq.

On December 4th, I interviewed talk radio?s Thom Hartmann, about his new book Cracking The Code: How To Win Hearts, Change Minds, and Restore America's Original Vision. Hartmann eloquently echoes Lakoff about framing Iraq as an occupation instead of a war in his book. He noted during our interview that immediately after he and Lakoff suggested the ?occupation? frame in 2006, Democrats took their advice. But they soon reverted to talking about Iraq as a war. Hartmann further observed that the corporatist media finds the war frame too profitable. Writing and broadcasting about an ?occupation? doesn?t sell as well or profit companies such as General Electric who have a financial stake in the media as well as military operations. The media is not going to describe Iraq as an occupation any time soon.

So it?s up to the reality based community of citizen journalists, bloggers, activists and just plain regular people to set the record straight. Many progressive bloggers reading this thread properly realized this long ago. But as we head into 2008 a reminder is in order. I for one plead guilty of too often playing into the hands of predatory conservatives and describing Iraq as a war.

So no matter what presidential candidate you?re supporting in 2008, please let their campaigns know you want Iraqi policy referred to as an ?occupation? and be assertive about it. Please telephone and write your representatives in congress as well (click here and here ). And on your blogs refer to Iraq as an occupation every time you post about it. Any street protests should also reinforce the message that we're opposing an occupation. Our 2008 New Years resolution should be to once and for all shift the terms of debate about Iraq from being a ?war? to an ?occupation.? At stake is the blood of our GIs, innocent Iraqi civilians and ending America?s estrangement from the civilized world.

Read The Full Article:
http://ooibc.blogspot.com/2007/12/topic-below-was-originally-posted-on-my.html

Digg this

Huck!

post from Eschaton on 26 December 2007 10:01:00 AM. © Eschaton

Awesome.

video details and more

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/206554940/2007_12_23_archive.html

Digg this

Bush Economy Is One Big Lump Of Coal For
Retailers

post from Firedoglake on 26 December 2007 10:00:00 AM. © Firedoglake

I thought Republicans were supposed to be good for business. A surge in spending over the weekend may not have been enough to rescue Target, Sears Holdings and Macy's from the slowest holiday spending season in five years. A five year low! Now why would[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://firedoglake.com/2007/12/26/bush-economy-is-one-big-lump-of-coal-for-retail
ers/

Digg this

Shirley Smith: Holiday Thoughts

post from BuzzFlash.org - Progressive News and Commentary with an Attitude | Fight Ignorance: Read BuzzFlash on 26 December 2007 09:51:19 AM. © BuzzFlash.org - Progressive News and Commentary with an Attitude | Fight Ignorance: Read BuzzFlash

MS. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON

BuzzFlash,

"Peace, the white space between the chapters in the history books." -- Leonard Levinson.

Bookmark/Search this post with:

buzzflash |

delicious | digg

digg |

technorati

Technorati Tags: Shirley Smith Holiday Peace Activism

Read The Full Article:
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/smith/240

Digg this

The Daily Muck

post from TPMmuckraker on 26 December 2007 09:49:17 AM. © TPMmuckraker

The U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay has been opened for since just after the September 11, 2001 attacks yet the military tribunal system there has produced only one conviction (through a plea bargain). Hundreds have been freed after having never been charged with any crime, yet Defense Secretary Robert Gates told a year-end Pentagon news conference that the government has made little progress toward its "vowed goal of closing" the prison. (AFP)

Experts in interrogation assert that ?the United States is behind the curve of current best practices, and that videotaping is an essential tool in improving the methods - and results - of questioning terrorism suspects.? According to the specialists, the lack of videotapes in ?as many as 100 ?high-value? terrorism suspects has prevented? the ?capturing? of details that should be ?archived, compared, and analyzed in-depth by a range of government experts.? (Boston Globe)

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/206551355/004977.php

Digg this

Not the Bottom

Home prices still falling.

NEW YORK (AP) -- U.S. home prices fell in October for the 10th consecutive month, posting their biggest monthly decline since early 1991, according to the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index.

The record 6.7 percent drop marked the 23rd consecutive month of price deceleration.

There are big regional variations unsurprisingly.

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/206544012/2007_12_23_archive.html

Digg this

Kansas GOP Chair Sends Email Boasting of Voter
Caging

Kris Kobach, a former counsel to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft who is currently the chairman of the Kansas GOP, sent out an email on Thur entitled “Kansas Republican Party Year in Review” in which he brags of voter caging. Blue Tide Rising has the goods:… Kris Kobach, chairman of the Kansas GOP, sent out [...]

Read The Full Article:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/26/kansas-gop-chair-sends-email-boasting-of
-voter-caging/

Digg this

Blogging and Preaching to the Political Choir

If ASZ or any other blog / online echo chamber has realized a modicum of pamphleteering success, it's in the aggregation of opinion and knowing that we're not the only ones who feel the frustrations with basic democratic processes that, at times, seem hopelessly broken.

Read The Full Article:
http://allspinzone.com/wp/2007/12/26/blogging-and-preaching-to-the-political-choi
r/

Digg this