Sign up here to have the Daily Kos Elections Digest emailed to you every weekday morning
7:01 PM PT: Before tonight, the delegate picture looked like this:
As you can see, Romney needed to win over 47 percent of the remaining delegates to lock up the nomination before the convention. Today's results will set him back. It's still tough to see how Santorum wins the necessary delegates, but it's clear that he and Gingrich can continue to deny Romney his nomination, and could do so at least until June (when the last states vote), if not beyond.
7:01 PM PT (David Nir): In MS-01 (R), Rep. Alan Nunnelee certainly looks like the winner, but his 57-30 margin (with 60% reporting) certainly is weak. His chief opponent, Henry Ross, is the former mayor of a town of 2,000 people who spent very little on this race, mostly saving his pennies for a last-minute ad buy. Nunnelee is fortunate that he likely won't have to deal with a runoff here.
7:02 PM PT (Steve Singiser): For those just checking in, welcome to the Alabama and Mississippi primaries Mitt Romney's worst nightmare. Rick Santorum has already been called the winner of the Alabama primary, and holds a pretty clear lead (35 percent) over Newt Gingrich (30 percent) and Mitt Romney (28 percent). Meanwhile, in Mississippi, there has been no call yet. But with nearly 60 percent of the vote tallied, the running order is the same: Santorum?Gingrich?Romney (33-32-30). Meanwhile, at the Congressional level, all of the incumbents are holding serve, with only Alan Nunnelee (MS-01) in danger of being forced into a runoff.
7:04 PM PT (David Nir): AL-05 (R) has been called for Rep. Mo Brooks, who leads turncoat former Dem Rep. Parker Griffith 71-29 with 31% reporting.
7:05 PM PT (David Nir): The AP has called MS-01 (R) for Rep. Alan Nunelee.
7:05 PM PT (David Jarman): To understand what went wrong for Mitt Romney in Alabama, you only need to look at one county: Shelby. That's the one just south of Jefferson County, where Birmingham is, and it contains a mix of affluent suburbs and brand-new exurbs. This should have been Romney's strongest county in the state, given its money (and given that similar counties are where Romney has performed strongest in previous states), but it looks like there's enough of an evangelical stronghold here that Rick Santorum is winding up winning it with 36, with 32 for Gingrich and only 23 for Mitt.
7:10 PM PT: Earlier today, Mitt Romney, the frontrunner scoring third-place finishes in two big states tonight, said that Santorum was "at the desperate end of his campaign.
7:12 PM PT (David Nir): Both GOP Reps. Spencer Bachus (AL-06) and Jo Bonner (AL-01) are in "no runoff" territory, though neither is doing super-great: Bachus is at 57% and Bonner at 63%.
7:17 PM PT (David Nir): CNN also calls Alabama for Santorum.
7:23 PM PT (Kaili Joy Gray): New thread here.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Sign up here to have the Daily Kos Elections Digest emailed to you every weekday morning
6:42 PM PT (David Nir): In AL-06 (R), Rep. Spencer Bachus is up 59-26 over state Sen. Scott Beason with 10% reporting. According to a local news reporter, Beason's hometown of Gardendale (in Jefferson County) came in for Bachus. If so, it's hard to see Bachus losing.
6:42 PM PT (Jed Lewison): On CNN, Candy Crowley goes way out on a limb and says the Newt Gingrich "has to win something" in order to have a shot at the nomination. Well, yeah. Of course he does.
6:42 PM PT: As we've been noting, Drudge proclaimed earlier that Mitt Romney would win Mississippi tonight. As of this post, Romney is coming in third. Hoping that holds!
6:43 PM PT (David Nir): In AL-05 (R), Rep. Mo Brooks is predictably crushing ex-Rep. Parker Griffith, 71-29 with 7% reporting. I don't know what Griffith was thinking, but he spent over half a mil of his own money on this hopeless quest.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!One of the things I looked at in an earlier installment of the foreclosure fraud settlement documents is how banks can satisfy their obligations by modifying mortgages they don't own. HUD again tried to push back on this with a blog post about "myths v.[...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/firedoglake/fdl/~3/kh0CmO0Dogo/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!The latest round of exit polls show Santorum picking up some ground on Romney. Now a two point spread between the two in Mississippi. [...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/yWsQO10p5sI/santo_still_in_
it.php
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Polls close statewide in Alabama and Mississippi at 8 p.m. ET. (Hawaii closes at 2 a.m. ET). We'll also be watching two congressional primaries in Alabama, where a pair of House committee chairmen, Spencer Bachus and Jo Bonner, are being challenged. All[...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/PFT3aan7z9E/polls_closing_a
t_top_of_the_hour.php
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!The National Review's Jim Geraghty found an article in the Washington Post titled, "Voters blame president for gas prices, experts say not so fast" -- and spotted a clear case of liberal bias.
Well of course it's Obama's fault, Geraghty wants us to believe -- just look at these facts. Then, with a little bait and switch (let's just call 2001 and 2008 averages, and mix those in with the single years--no one will notice!) -- and presto: it's all Obama's fault.
Of course, gas prices nearly tripled under Bush/Cheney -- but Jim undoubtedly blames the Sierra Club and Nancy Pelosi for that.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Still too close to call.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
No, I didn't take this picture. Even if I knew how to take pictures with the thing, I could hardly have taken a picture of it, could I?
"[M]aybe the whole Internet will simply become like Facebook: falsely jolly, fake-friendly, self-promoting, slickly disingenuous. For all these reasons I quit Facebook about two months after I'd joined it. As with all seriously addictive things, giving up proved to be immeasurably harder than starting. I kept changing my mind: Facebook remains the greatest distraction from work I've ever had, and I loved it for that. I think a lot of people love it for that. Some work-avoidance techniques are onerous in themselves and don't make time move especially quickly: smoking, eating, calling people up on the phone. With Facebook hours, afternoons, entire days went by without my noticing."
-- Zadie Smith, in a November 2010 New York Review
of Books essay, "Generation Why?"
"[O]n Twitter you find yourself doing all sorts of things you wouldn't otherwise do. And once you've entered the Enchanted E-Forest, lured in there by cute bunnies and playful kittens, you can find yourself wandering around in it for quite some time."
-- Margaret Atwood, in a new NYRB blogpost,
"Deeper into the Twungle"
by Ken
I just dug up the New York Review of Books piece that contains the above quote from the almost-always-stimulating Zadie Smith. It's an essay that took as its jumping-off points the Aaron Sorkin-David Fincher film The Social Network and Jaron Lanier's book You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. The quote, once found, turned out to be very much as I remembered it. What surprised me is what a small portion of the piece this quote represents.
Somehow I had forgotten how generally, and even alarmedly, negative Smith (left) was in the piece with regard to Facebook and the kind of social, or antisocial, mindset it embodies. I can see now that this didn't surprise me back in November 2010. Probably what surprised me then was learning that she had actually been through a period of Facebook addiction. From my own experience, I just couldn't understand how this was even possible, not for someone with such seemingly strong connections to nonvirtual reality as Smith.
I had recently come through a brief period of trying, at the recommendation of (once-trusted) friends who assured me that Facebook would open a new world to me, to find some reason -- any reason -- for hanging out on Facebook. I was never able to figure out how or why anybody would spend more time there than the couple of minutes it takes to whiz through the latest maunderings posted by the person's "friends."
I still can't figure it out. Even now, I keep receiving regular e-mails from Facebook claiming that I have new "notifications," which always turns out to be a lie. The first couple of times I went scrounging all around the damned site in search of these new notifications, until I found a screen that told me in no uncertain terms that I had no new notifications. That at least relieved my anxiety that I was missing some desperately important communication. Now when I get one of those fib-mails, I do sometimes check into my account, just to peek at the graffiti scrawled over my "wall." I've accepted a bunch of "friend" invitations, if only out of politeness, and some of these are people I actually wouldn't mind hearing from, or at least about. Every now and then I pick up a scrap of information, like the death of a parent or the birth of a new grandchild. I've never timed it, but I think I usually get in and out of the site in two or three minutes.
I SHOULD EXPLAIN THAT TWO OR THREE (MAYBE FOUR)
WEEKS AGO TODAY MY SMARTPHONE WAS DELIVERED
Partly I can't remember how many weeks it was (I just remember it was a Monday, because I wasn't expecting it to arrive till maybe Wednesday) because after the couple of days it took to get the thing activated and straighten out a number of details with my provider in order to get my online account set up, I haven't so much as turned it on.
I admit, I'm a-scared of it. I don't know how to do a darned thing with it, and it scares me to be that clueless. Now, I'm not constitutionally technophobic. There was a time, notably when I was first making my way in the computer world, when few things gave me more pleasure than ripping open the package of a new item of hardware or softward and attacking the manual to get the thing up and running and teach myself how to manage at least its basic functions.
No more. Somewhere along the line I lost confidence in my ability to make head or tail of the manual. This goes back at least to the time I boldly ordered a SCSI card to expand my fairly primitive Mac, so that I could have such unimagined newfangled devices as a CD-ROM drive, and was so intimidated by all the intricacies I had heard and read about that I don't think I ever even opened the package. (I outwaited myself. Eventually I bought a new computer that had all that stuff taken care of internally.)
At the moment somewhere in my apartment I've got the package containing the Elements of Photoshop software I ordered sitting safely (I assume). Even if I found a window of courage for installing it, I would first have to find the package.
With regard to the smartphone, I've written before about my resistance to this whole world of "apps." But I faced a decision. I literally wasn't using my old dumbphone at all, partly because it wasn't working so well anymore, and would have had to be replaced if I hoped to get any use out of it, but also because I just didn't seem to have any use for it, with the exception of when I was traveling, when it was a fabulous thing to have -- but I hardly ever travel. I really only broke down and got the damned thing because there came a moment during my mother's long decline, 1500 miles away, when I simply had to have a way to be in regular contact with her onsite caregivers. (I was being hassled at work for using my office phone.)
It's now more than two years since my mother died, though, and for month on end my "usage" month after month was zero. Not zero above my allotted minutes, but zero. Not a great return on my montly $50-plus investment. I faced the choice, it seemed to me, especially with my phone itself in need of replacing, of either down- or upgrading -- either giving the thing up altogether or seeing how much it would cost to upgrade to smarphone service and see if I might actually use it.
Before my phone even arrived, I had found and downloaded the manual, and then printed the whole 200 pages out. And then carried them around in an envelope back and forth between home and work every day, hardly daring to peek inside.
I thought, as last weekend approached, during which I would be doing three walking tours and might well want to write something about them, that this would be a great time to figure out how to use the camera function. (My poor old dumbphone took pictures, but I never found a way of extracting them from the device.) In the days preceding I kept thinking this would be a good time to crack open that printout of the manual. No go.
Even when I set out on Saturday morning, I had with me both the envelope containing the printout and, safely tucked I away (I hoped), the contraption itself. I had about a 45-minute ride on the M100 bus to the meeting point for my Municipal Art Society walk from Harlem into the Mott Haven area of the Bronx. I found other occupations to fill that time. As I wrote here, I had about a 50-minute subway ride from the Bronx to the Park Slope area of Brooklyn for my MAS walking tour there. Again, I found other ways to fill the time.
It's true that much of the time from my return home Saturday to my departure for my Sunday MAS walking tour of Downtown Brooklyn was filled with work on my Sunday Classics post, but I could still have cracked open the smartphone manual on the subway ride to Brooklyn. But I didn't. I did wind up writing a post, but had no pictures of my own to add to it.
The reason I'm going into all this just now is that not long before I started writing this post I stumbled across the new NYRB blogpost by Margaret Atwood from which the second quote at the top is taken. Here's a little more of what the distinguished writer -- not a grand passion of mine, but someone I certainly take seriously -- has to say:
[On] Twitter you find yourself doing all sorts of things you wouldn't otherwise do. And once you've entered the Enchanted E-Forest, lured in there by cute bunnies and playful kittens, you can find yourself wandering around in it for quite some time. You might even find yourself climbing the odd tree -- the very odd tree -- or taking refuge in the odd hollow log -- the very odd hollow log -- because cute bunnies and playful kittens are not the only things alive in the mirkwoods of the Web. Or the webs of the mirkwoods. Paths can get tangled there. Plots can get thickened. Games are afoot.
When I first started Twittering, back in 2009 -- you can read about my early adventures in a NYRblog post I wrote two years ago -- I was, you might say, merely capering on the flower-bestrewn fringes of the Twitterwoods. . . .
[Editor's note: The above photo of Ms. A appeared with the 2009 NYRB blogpost she cites, which was titled "Atwood in the Twittersphere." The 2009 caption read: "Margaret Atwood, tweeting aboard the Queen Mary 2, August 2009."]
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
I'm a little disappointed with the Prophetess Jennifer Lynn Joy's prophecy for 2012. She relates no big miraclulous event like last year's Miracle of the Sacred and Holy Salt of Ice Melting.
Still, she spews a lot of great prophecy for 2012. She certainly predicts my reaction to the next earthquake:
Regarding the earth, I awaken often to the sound of the earth?s crust fracturing and hear the sound of my own voice screaming, ?JESUS!?And she has comforting words for those who will rebel against the establishment of the Republic of Gilead and the need for contraception camps.
The Government of YESHUA, our MESSIAH will begin arising in 2012 as never before, uniquely, unprecedented, surprising, supernaturally in a variety of forms and functions. (Isa. 9:6-7). Many will find HIS justice, with limited human perspective, to be unfair and unkind, whereas others will embrace the freedom that HIS Government will bring to the earth. HIS true followers will increase exponentially in 2012. The sons and daughters of the MOST HIGH GOD will be positioned strategically for the new season. The friends of GOD will be trusted with greater responsibility and accountability.Wait, I just found this year's miracle on another page:
The LORD asked me to bring 50 pairs of earrings, the night before, so I did. They were placed on the Communion Table as well as the ?Linen Napkins?. Exactly 50 women were in attendance?the Holy Spirit still knows how to count. Two women left early without their earrings, so their earrings were given to others who gladly received a double portion blessing. I gave each woman a brief prophetic word regarding the earrings that she chose. It was an intentional gift for each woman to increase in her hearing of the Rhema word of the LORD, just as the Linen Napkin with a Scripture enclosed is an intentional gift about a divine exchange and receiving a written Word from HIM.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Sign up here to have the Daily Kos Elections Digest emailed to you every weekday morning
5:56 PM PT (David Nir): In MS-01 (R), it's just 2 precincts reporting, but Henry Ross is up 281 votes to 84 over Rep. Alan Nunnelee.
6:04 PM PT (David Nir): Now the MS-01 (R) numbers are making a bit more sense?good reason not to rely on those super-early returns. 4% reporting, Nunnelee up 59-31.
6:07 PM PT (David Nir): 5% reporting in MS, and it's 32 Santo, 32 Romney, 29 Newt.
6:09 PM PT (David Nir): In what is probably the marquee congressional primary tonight, votes are starting to show up in AL-06 (R), where state Sen. Scott Beason is hoping to unseat Rep. Spencer Bachus.
6:11 PM PT (David Nir): With 2% now reporting in AL, it's Santo 35, Newt 29, Mitt 28.
6:18 PM PT (David Nir): 15% of the vote has been counted in Jefferson County, AL (home of Birmingham), but Romney only leads 31, 31 (Newt), 30 (Santo). This is an area of the state with a lot of professionals - i.e., where he ought to be doing better, though.
6:19 PM PT (David Nir): Up to 15% in MS, and Santo leads 33-30-30, with Newt in 2nd.
6:21 PM PT (David Nir): Well, the MS-02 Dem primary turned out to be a dud. It's already been called for Rep. Bennie Thompson, who leads by 87-13 over Heather McTeer with 8% reporting.
6:26 PM PT: Remember, once again Romney has blown away Santorum in spending:
Alabama:
Romney + Super PAC: $1.66 million
Santorum + Super PAC: $319K
Mississippi
Romney + Super PAC: $973K
Santorum + Super PAC: $307K
And yet, Santorum will either win both states or lose by the narrowest of margins.
6:26 PM PT (David Nir): MS-01 (R): Looking like Rep. Alan Nunnelee will clear the 50% mark to avoid a runoff, but his 59% so far with 16% reporting is rather unimpressive, given how weak his chief opponent is.
6:28 PM PT:6:35 PM PT (Kaili Joy Gray): New thread here.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Powered by blogdig.net