hitcounter
This site is an rss/xml news reader containing our favorite feeds. All articles are the copyrighted material of the blogs that wrote them.

Australian fires claim at least 173 people,
police closing in on arsonists

Many are now calling for the arsonists to face murder charges based on the 173 people already found dead. Surely more will be found as the fires are contained.

Australian towns devastated in the country's worst bushfires were declared crime scenes tonight as forensic investigators began combing the charred landscape for evidence of how the infernos started, and who may have ignited them.

Police indicated that they were closing in on arsonists believed to be responsible for lighting some of the 400 blazes that have killed at least 170 people, left 5,000 homeless and destroyed a 350,000 hectare area north of Melbourne in the past three days.

As firefighters continued to battle raging fires that threaten a further six towns north of Melbourne, the attorney general, Robert McClelland, told parliament that those responsible for lighting them could be charged with murder. Senior police confirmed they are preparing photofits of suspected firebugs.

"We'll soon be in a position to provide face images of people we believe responsible,"Detective Sergeant Brett Kahan told the Melbourne Age. Announcing a special taskforce to investigate the fires, the Victorian police commissioner, Christine Nixon, said she was "optimistic" that arrests would be made.

The prime minister, Kevin Rudd, echoed the anger of a nation yesterday when he described such actions as "mass murder". Fighting back tears, he said: "This is of a level of horror that few of us anticipated."

Last night, a 60 mile (96km) wall of fire was continuing its advance on towns north of Melbourne. Authorities said the bushfires could take many days to control.


Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Americablog/~3/gHS8R7JwdeU/australian-fires-claim-
at-least-173.html


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Geithner Said to Have Prevailed on the Bailout
(New York Times)

New York Times:
Geithner Said to Have Prevailed on the Bailout  —  WASHINGTON— The Obama administration's new plan to bail out the nation's banks was fashioned after a spirited internal debate that pitted the Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, against some of the president's top political hands.



Read The Full Article:
http://www.memeorandum.com/090209/p181#a090209p181


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Right wing gripes about press conference

I’m currently arguing with some physicians who are right-wing knuckleheads. They are[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2009/02/09/8106/


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Obama Backs Off a Reversal on Secrets (John
Schwartz/New York Times)

John Schwartz / New York Times:
Obama Backs Off a Reversal on Secrets  —  SAN FRANCISCO — In a closely watched case involving rendition and torture, a lawyer for the Obama administration seemed to surprise a panel of federal appeals judges on Monday by pressing ahead with an argument for preserving state secrets originally developed by the Bush administration.



Read The Full Article:
http://www.memeorandum.com/090209/p152#a090209p152


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Indie Retailer of the Day: Roadside Projects

I was surprised to read that the art from Roadside Projects is 2 D. Artist Jayme McGowan utilizes colors so deftly that the prints look like dioramas. The surreal circus themes in many of the pieces are just icing on the cake for me.[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://www.mouemagazine.com/blog/2009/02/indie-retailer-of-the-day-roadside-proje
cts/


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Israel in 2009

With Israelis heading to the polls in just a few hours, the polling suggests a fairly tight race, with the right wing Likud in the neighborhood of 26 mandates, the center-right Kadima pulling in roughly 23 mandates, the secular nationalist Israel[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/mydd/~3/p-CG6azBXhQ/04245


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Open Thread and Diary Rescue

Tonight's rescue brought to you by dopper0189, grog, ItsJessMe, Louisiana 1976, shayera, and ybruti, with srkp23 editing.

jotter serves up High Impact Diaries: February 8, 2009.

sardonyx brings Top Comments: What's in a Name Edition.

Enjoy and please promote your own favorite diaries in this open thread.



Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/svHsVk_1IBw/695484


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Did anything change "No, your honor"

That is the damning reply delivered by an Obama Justice Department official today in the oral argument in the Jeppesen extraordinary renditions flights case. The NYTimes reports this exchange:

“Is there anything material that has happened” that might have caused the Justice Department to shift its views, asked Judge Mary M. Schroeder, an appointee of President Jimmy Carter, coyly referring to the recent election.

“No, your honor,” Mr. Letter replied. “The change in administration has no bearing?” she asked.

“No, your honor,” he said once more.

The Obama Administration, trying to deflect the stain of this exchange, stated that:

“It is the policy of this administration to invoke the state secrets privilege only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases,” he said, adding that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. had asked for a review of pending cases in which the government had previously asserted a state secret privilege.

“The attorney general has directed that senior Justice Department officials review all assertions of the state secrets privilege to ensure that the privilege is being invoked only in legally appropriate situations,” he said. “It is vital that we protect information that, if released, could jeopardize national security.

Putting two and two together, one of two things has happened - Holder reviewed and approved the state secrets assertion in the Jeppesen case (and indeed the government attorney arguing before the 9th Circuit said as much) or the government attorney misled the 9th Circuit panel.

The Justice Department spokesman is clearly, imo, misleading here. The Jeppesen case is clearly one where the state secret privilege is poorly invoked. Indeed, there is no secret anymore as to what happened.

Holder and the Obama Administration are BSing us on this issue. Unlike some, I believe that there are appropriate situations for application and invocation of the state secrets privilege. I think it serves an important function. The Jeppesen case is about as far a case as one could imagine where the invocation of the state secrets privilege can possibly be deemed appropriate.

Greenwald has wall to wall coverage.

Speaking for me only



Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TalkleftThePoliticsOfCrime/~3/7qK6AAs11hs/72756


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

Congrats Sam Stein & Huffington Post: A Historic
Moment in the Obama White House

The clouds didn't open. A choir didn't start singing. A ray of sunlight didn't come[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenLeft-FrontPage/~3/536178649/showDiary.do


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!

So Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, and Michael Steele
Walk Into a Bar

If I weren't so busy hoarding cans of catfood to live on during the next Great Depression, I'd be laughing at the joke that is the Republican Party.[...]

Read The Full Article:
http://firedoglake.com/2009/02/09/so-rush-limbaugh-sarah-palin-and-michael-steele
-walk-into-a-bar/


Add to del.icio.us   Digg this   Post to Furl   Add to reddit   Add to myYahoo!
Website designed by Bartosz Brzezinski
Powered by blogdig.net