Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah?the ?Four Corners? states plus their western neighbors?are home to some of the best renewable electricity potential in the country. These states have consistently sunny skies for solar power, wind-blown plains and deserts for turbines, and underground heat perfect for geothermal energy. They also have incredible potential for smaller-scale technologies like rooftop solar panels and energy efficiency improvements.
Our analysis shows these states can house clean energy projects that could realistically provide more than 34 gigawatts of solar, wind, and geothermal energy over the next two decades. This development could stimulate more than $137 billion in investment in the renewable energy sector, create more than 209,000 direct jobs, and provide electricity for 7 million homes. With supportive federal policies, these renewable electricity goals can be met and surpassed.
Already, the American West leads the way in construction of clean and renewable electricity projects on the ground, spurred forward by policies including state renewable electricity standards and government investments in clean technologies. A recent Bureau of Labor Statistics study reflects this success, determining that in 2010, ?green goods and services? accounted for:
This comes to 527,083 jobs altogether in these six states.
Such projects and employment reinforce westerners? perspective that renewable energy is a key component of their states? economic future. A poll this year by the Colorado College ?State of the Rockies Project? found that two-thirds of voters polled said ?increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power will create new jobs? in their states.
And when it came to comparing fossil fuels and renewables, western voters were far more likely to encourage more wind and solar power over coal and oil. In response to the question ?which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [your state]??, respondents answered overwhelmingly in favor of clean energy. (see Figure 1)
The clean energy revolution in these western states is already under way, and federal lands offer significant opportunity for continued and increased investment in clean electricity. The West is home to hundreds of millions of acres of federally managed public lands, which are mostly under the purview of the Department of the Interior and the Forest Service. Lands open for energy development do not include millions of acres of national parks, national monuments, wilderness areas, and other places protected by law.
Much of the energy development on public lands occurs on areas managed by the Department of the Interior?s Bureau of Land Management. This agency oversees a large amount of the acreage in all six states: about 17 percent of Arizona, 15 percent of California, 12 percent of Colorado, 68 percent of Nevada, 17 percent of New Mexico, and 43 percent of Utah.
Taxpayer-owned lands are already a part of our country?s clean energy revolution. In fact, dozens of solar, wind, and geothermal projects sited on public lands are either currently providing electricity or have been permitted to do so and are ready to be built. A report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory elaborated that:
With 5,200 MW of [renewable energy] authorized or approved [on Bureau of Land Management Land], and approximately 8,000 MW of additional 2011 and 2012 high priority projects, the BLM appears to be on track to meet the [Energy Policy Act of 2005] requirement of approving 10,000 MW of RE on public lands by 2012.
This is just the beginning, and many more installations could be responsibly sited and built in these states over the next 20 years, bringing economic development and job creation to the West. Additional policies are essential to turn these opportunities into reality.
To capture the full economic, energy, and public health benefits from this opportunity, the federal government should adopt four essential policies:
Our report identifies the vast opportunities for renewable energy installations on public lands in the West, but this does not imply that we endorse their deployment on every acre. Some places are not appropriate for energy development, and instead should be managed for multiple uses including hunting, fishing, recreation, wildlife, and other such essential values.
How much clean energy, jobs, and investment could western public lands generate?
We assessed the federal government?s ?reasonably foreseeable development scenarios? for the likelihood of renewable energy development on public lands in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. These analyses examine the economic and policy conditions in the six states to determine how much renewable energy on public lands could realistically be generated over 20 years. These results are shown in Figure 2.
As seen in the chart above, public lands in these six states could reasonably be the location for the development of 34,399 megawatts (or 34.4 gigawatts) of wind, solar, and geothermal energy over the next 20 years. This is enough electricity to power more than 7 million homes, or about equivalent to the number of homes in the Four Corners states.
It is important to note that these figures are what the Department of the Interior considers to be realistic development, which is different than renewable energy potential on public lands in the West which is much greater. Our goal is to encourage the achievement of this outlook and to go beyond it.
It is difficult to determine how many acres this development might entail for the six states that we studied due to lack of data for geothermal energy. But the same reasonably foreseeable development scenarios that we relied on for megawatt estimates found that on public lands in all of the western states surveyed, together about 214,000 acres of solar and 160,100 acres of wind could likely be developed over two decades. While the government?s analysis is less clear on the number of acres that could be disturbed for geothermal development, it estimates that about 133 additional geothermal power plants could be built by 2025, which would cover an average of up to 367 acres each. So we can guess that approximately 48,811 acres at most could be used for geothermal energy.
The development of renewable energy on public lands in the six states that we examined could create hundreds of thousands of direct jobs through project construction, installation, and operation and maintenance. According to the Electric Power Research Institute, each megawatt of wind energy creates about 2.9 direct jobs, solar creates about 6.6 direct jobs, and geothermal creates about 5.7 direct jobs.
Under these assumptions, and using the development scenarios in Figure 2, we find that more than 209,000 direct jobs could be created by building these 34.4 gigawatts. These results can be seen in Figure 3.
Additionally, building these projects will create direct investment in the six states. Many large financial institutions plan to invest in clean energy. Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Bank of America Corp. have pledged to invest a combined $120 billion in the clean energy technologies sector over the coming years. Responsibly developing clean energy projects on America?s eligible public lands can help attract these investments, particularly in more rural areas that would benefit from the jobs and economic opportunity that the new projects can bring.
To calculate the investment in renewable energy development that public lands might help stimulate, we looked at average investment in the renewable energy sector per megawatt by determining the costs to install the projects. According to data from the Energy Information Administration, the average installed costs for utility-scale solar are $4,667 per watt ($4.667 million per megawatt), $2,403 per kilowatt ($2.403 million per megawatt) for wind, and $2,482 per kilowatt ($2.482 million per megawatt) for geothermal. In total, we estimate that $137 billion of investment in the renewable energy sector could be stimulated by reasonably foreseeable development on public lands in the West. (see Figure 4)
Making clean electricity from western public lands a reality
Several important policies are necessary to ensure that we meet the realistic projection to build 34 gigawatts of renewable energy on appropriate public lands over the next two decades, and to eventually exceed that goal. Policies are also needed that account for the impacts of any industrial development on air and water quality, and landscapes. Specifically:
Let?s examine each of these proposals briefly in turn.
National clean energy standard
President Barack Obama proposed a clean energy standard of 80 percent by 2035 that includes low-pollution electricity generation such as wind, solar, geothermal, natural gas, coal with carbon capture and storage, and nuclear power. This standard would require utilities to ensure that 80 percent of the electricity that they deliver is low carbon by 2050.
We support this proposal because of the jobs and market certainty that it would provide, but also urge that the standard include a requirement that at least 35 percent of electricity be generated by wind, solar, geothermal, other renewables, and efficiency by 2035 to ensure continued investment in these technologies. This would help energy development on public lands by stimulating a strong market for renewable energy across the country.
Public lands clean resources standard
The president also should use executive authority to establish a ?clean resources standard? for energy resources from eligible public lands. This would require that 35 percent of the electricity generated from resources mined, drilled, or otherwise extracted from public lands and waters be renewable by 2035. Similar to President Obama?s proposed clean energy standard designed to increase the amount of renewable electricity that utilities sell, this policy is designed to boost development of renewable electricity from public lands.
Currently, 66 percent of electricity generated from resources from public lands and waters is from coal, while only 1 percent is from solar, wind, and geothermal combined. This shows that the use of our public lands for electricity generation heavily favors coal, and it neglects the contribution that our public lands could make toward development of low- and no-carbon electricity.
New energy zones
Siting large-scale renewable energy development on public lands across the country must take into account other values including hunting, fishing recreation, clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and scenery in accordance with the Bureau of Land Management?s multiple use mandate. One way to ensure that renewable energy development on public lands respects these values is for the Department of the Interior to build upon its program to establish incentivized zones for solar development on public lands. This program allows for incentives such as streamlined permitting, lower fees, and prioritized transmission capacity to be put in place for solar projects that are sited in designated zones. The zones will also have been screened for wildlife and other environmental conflicts to ensure that they will be minimal.
On July 24, 2012, the Department of the Interior released the final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. It designates 17 solar zones covering approximately 285,000 acres, and also opens up an additional 19 million acres to the possibility of solar energy development. A final decision approving the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement will be made by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in the next few months.
In addition to fine-tuning and finalizing the solar energy zones, this policy should also be extended to wind projects to ensure that they too will have more certainty and fewer legal challenges when it comes to siting on public lands.
Electric transmission policy reforms
A major challenge to the deployment of large-scale renewable energy on public lands is the lack of adequate electrical transmission capacity to transmit this clean electricity to communities that need it. This process should be reformed, which could be accomplished in a variety of ways. As CAP previously wrote in 2010:
Transmission reform is urgent. ? [we need to] create a system for effectively siting new transmission. Such a system will likely combine [Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] oversight with a clearly defined role for state regulators, balancing the need for regional and national planning with respect for state and local conditions.
This policy would lead to the construction or improvement of transmission lines by clarifying and streamlining the siting and permitting process. Additionally, federal authority to plan, site, and allocate costs for the construction of new transmission lines should be strengthened in the case that states do not work together to upgrade transmission capacity. The implementation of the Federal Regulatory Commission?s Order Number 1000 should be supported to help achieve these goals.
Public lands in the American West can help lead the nation?s transition to a cleaner, cheaper electricity system. Our analysis shows that under reasonably foreseeable federal government development scenarios for renewable energy development, more than 34 gigawatts of solar, wind, and geothermal energy could be built on public lands in the Four Corners states plus California and Nevada over the next 20 years. This would provide economic opportunities?more than 209,000 direct jobs and $137 billion in investment in the renewable energy sector. With supportive policies there is great potential to build additional wind, solar, and geothermal electricity projects on public lands in the West.
This region has the opportunity to become a leader in the development of homegrown American energy not subject to volatile fossil-fuel prices, creating jobs that cannot be outsourced and developing technologies for export to other countries. But in order to realize this likelihood and also help the region achieve its even greater potential for renewable energy, a number of additional policies should be put in place. These include a national clean energy standard, a clean resources standard for public lands and waters, energy zones, and electric transmission policy reforms to update our aging system.
Jessica Goad is Manager of Research and Outreach for the Public Lands Project at the Center for American Progress; Daniel J. Weiss is a Senior Fellow and Director of Climate Strategy at the Center; Richard Caperton is Director of Clean Energy Investment at the Center.
A local tea party group in Pennsylvania called Northeast Pennsylvania Spirit of 1776 is sending out an email alert in which it imagines the Founding Fathers beating up President Obama in Heaven for being a “radical, socialist leader”:
ThinkProgress spoke with a member of the group, who confirmed that the organization sent out the mailing to its members. She explained that the missive was funny because it’s predicated on the notion that Obama “may be a Muslim.” NEPA Spirit Of 1776 appears to be an independent group that does not endorse candidates and is not aligned with the Republican party.
The bit is a copy of Robin Williams’ ’71 Virginians’ routine, in which he jokes that Osama bin Laden is greeted by Virginians — rather than virgins — when he dies and goes to Heaven.
Last week, in what Reuters called “a rare show of bipartisan unity,” the Senate Finance Committee approved a package of so-called tax extenders by a 19-5 vote. The extenders package contains a variety of expiring tax provisions that are regularly renewed.
The senators on the committee were slapping themselves on the back for achieving some modicum of tax reform — with Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) even saying, “By doing this, we?ve come a long way toward functionality” — but the package includes several problematic provisions, including:
– A tax break for NASCAR;
– A tax break for producing rum;
– The extension of two provisions that help corporations offshore their profits and avoid taxes.
Citizens for Tax Justice noted that, if Congress actually allowed the latter two corporate tax provisions to expire, “many U.S. companies will have much less incentive to send their profits (and possibly jobs) offshore.” Overall, the bill would spend $40 billion next year on special interest tax breaks.
The tax code is absolutely plagued by preferences and subsidies, which are essentially spending programs that are administered through the tax code. These tax expenditures total $1 trillion every year. However, senators on the Finance Committee seem content to celebrate their work, even after leaving some of the most egregious examples of these giveaways untouched.
In response to a letter from a coalition of LGBT groups, the Department of Health and Human Services has confirmed that discrimination against transgender people by federal health care programs and programs funded with federal dollars is illegal under the Affordable Care Act. Leon Rodriguez — the director of HHS’s civil rights office — responded to LGBT advocacy organizations’ concerns that Obamacare’s anti-discrimination Section 1557 did not clarify whether or not it included transgender people in its protections. In the letter, Rodriguez deems discrimination based on “gender identity or failure to conform to stereotypical notions of masculinity or femininity” in ACA-related programs illegal. Before the passage of Obamacare, for example, a transgender woman was denied coverage for routine treatment for a deviated septum because of her “condition.” Thankfully, the HHS has clarified that under Obamacare, this practice would now be forbidden.
Gabby Douglas was the topic du jour for Olympic commentators throughout last week, but over the weekend, she became a centerpiece in another manufactured controversy at Fox News, America’s top outlet for manufactured controversies. Douglas’ pink leotard, Fox host Alisyn Camerota lamented, was emblematic of an Olympic “trend” (one that, Fox wants you to believe, is part of a liberal-left conspiracy to rid the world of red, white, and blue) of athletes wearing colors that don’t appear on the American flag.
“Some folks have noticed that the American athletes’ uniforms don’t carry the stars and stripes look as much as they have in past years,” Camerota complained, without any evidence of who “some folks” might be. “The famous flag-styled outfits worn in year’s past replaced with yellow shirts, gray track suits, pink leotards.” Radio host/Tea Partier David Webb later chimed in with a sad tome about how America has “lost over time that jingoistic feeling” because “a soft anti-American feeling that Americans can’t show their exceptionalism”:
Camerota and Webb apparently haven’t watched much of the Olympics, or else they would have noticed the multitude of Americans donning red, white, and blue uniforms. But even if they have, Fox has apparently decided to use the Olympics to advance the false notion — one it began cultivating shortly after 9/11 — that anyone who doesn’t constantly wrap him or herself in the flag isn’t sufficiently patriotic. A politician who doesn’t wear a lapel pin isn’t American enough; an athlete who wears pink doesn’t appreciate her country the way she should (even if her father serves in the military).
Aside from the fact that athletes eschewing the colors of their home countries isn’t a particularly radical development, the Fox version of patriotism isn’t patriotism at all. Rather, it is a hollow display of jingoism that, despite Webb’s concerns, we don’t need any more of. True patriotism doesn’t come from the color of an athlete’s clothes, it is determined by how they act and compete on a world stage while representing their country. It comes in many forms, from celebrating on the medal stage as the national anthem plays to crying because it doesn’t, and it even comes in the form of protests that aim to make one’s country — and the world — a better, more equitable place or feats, like Douglas’, that highlight the overwhelming socio-economic barriers facing many of our greatest athletes.
That might be anathema to conservatives like Webb and media outlets like Fox, who have spent the last decade trying to convince America that true patriotism comes from putting on a “These Colors Don’t Run” t-shirt and pointing an accusatory finger at anyone who doesn’t do the same, but it’s true.
“I’m proud to be an American!” Webb declared during the segment. So am I, and so too, I presume, is Gabby Douglas. She just doesn’t need to wrap herself inside the flag to prove it.
Arijit Guha, a 31-year-old doctoral student at Arizona State University, hit his lifetime limit of $300,000 on his student insurance plan very quickly while fighting Stage 4 colon cancer. To pay for the remaining $118,000 in medical bills from his chemotherapy treatments, Guha started selling items on his website, Poop Strong, in February. He said a friend called his fundraiser “the world’s most important bake sale,” and he told Wonkblog’s Sarah Kliff that it “feels like this weird joke, that I?m selling T-shirts to pay for chemotherapy.”
In late July, Guha tried a faster way to address the unpaid bills: Twitter. He used the social media site to call out his insurance carrier, Aetna:
He sent a tweet to his insurance carrier, Aetna: ?@Aetna?s 4th qtr profit up 73%: ?it continued to benefit from low use of health care.? Helps they can ensure low use.?
After he engaged in a back-and-forth with chief executive Mark Bertolini, the insurance company moved quickly to work out a solution. Within 24 hours, Guha?s 23-word tweet had done more than six straight months of fundraising ever could: It persuaded Aetna to cover all his outstanding medical bills, showcasing the power of social media to catalyze swift action from a major company. [...]
?Although he reached the limits of his plan, Aetna care managers have continued to provide support and we have worked to develop a solution,? the company said in a statement. [...]
Guha has come away with a similar conclusion. He was ecstatic about the result. But he also considers himself as an exception to the rule: Not every American struggling with medical debt gets into a Twitter exchange with a health insurance CEO and catches a lucky break.
Thanks to Obamacare, insurance providers will have to eliminate lifetime limits on health care plans. This regulation kicked in for student insurance plans in July 2012, so Guha will not have to worry about the $300,000 limit he passed long ago the next time he renews his insurance plan. And students who sign up for insurance plans through their universities will be guaranteed more comprehensive coverage.
As ThinkProgress reported in June, the plans some schools offer are mini-med plans that provide almost no protection when students actually get sick or injured. Upping the standards will lead to much better coverage for more students, and it is possible to avoid rising costs while improving benefits. In Massachusetts, for example, a number of schools joined together to buy coverage collectively for 12,000 students without dramatically increasing premiums.
According to the Government Accountability Office, 600,000 students — 7 percent of 18 to 23-year-olds in college ? bought insurance through their school?s plans. By providing more comprehensive plans, like removing lifetime limits, future students faced with the same situation as Guha hopefully will not have to turn to T-shirt sales and Twitter to cover their cancer treatments.
As fighting continues in Aleppo, with 20,000 Syrian regime troops preparing a final assault, a confusing set of reports indicates that the Prime Minister has defected to Jordan. Defections like this represent as great a threat to the legitimacy of the[...]
Read The Full Article:
Think you've got a bead on the best sectors to own? It's amazing how often assumptions can differ from reality. While most investors may believe the technology or financial sectors tend to offer . . . → Read More: The Best Sector to Own Isn’t One You’d Think
Read The Full Article:
Once again Mitt Romney's team has managed to raise significantly more in donations than did President Obama's campaign during the last month. According to the two campaigns, Romney's side brought in roughly $25 million more in July than Obama did for[...]
Read The Full Article:
- Why internal polls can tell us more than we think about the 2012 elections, by Steve Singiser
- Mitt Romney perverts concept of a level playing field in energy. Not by accident, by Meteor Blades
- Hunt for swing voters ignores an even more valuable group of voters, by David Jarman
- Gabby, Dominique, and Black Women's Never Rewarded Quest for Recognition, by shanikka
- The battle against whitewashing and racebending, by Denise Oliver Velez
- Swing voters want their Social Security, Medicare, and good government, by Joan McCarter
They say all politics is local. And in running for reelection, Obama has taken that political maxim to heart by speaking more with journalists who are outside the Beltway and whose states' electoral votes matter most this November.
In 2012, Obama has done 58 local media interviews and eight national media interviews, according to information provided by CBS News' Mark Knoller, the White House press corps' "unofficial keeper of presidential data." More than half of those local interviews were with journalists located in swing states.
... O'Connor said she's not blind to the public's plunging view of the Supreme Court. She suggested the dip may have begun with the Bush v. Gore case in 2000, when the Court halted the counting of disputed ballots and then ruled George W. Bush the winner of the presidential election, after returns had rendered the race in Florida too close to call.
As the new rover that just landed on Mars looks for signs of life there, the NASA program that runs it is supporting life here on Earth -- with jobs.
NASA spokesman Guy Webster said the rover, named Curiosity, is currently supporting about 700 people, but has supported 7,000 jobs at various times over the last eight years. The Curiosity project and its $2.5 billion budget has generated jobs not just at NASA but at companies ranging from Lockheed Martin to a bicycle manufacturer in Chattanooga, Tenn.
It was a bees goodbye for United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Sunday afternoon in the capital as bees thronged Kamuzu International Airport when she was about to leave the country. [...]
This forced Mrs. Clinton to quickly board her plane to avoid any bee stings.